<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Dolemite's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/514989</link>
		<description>Comments by Dolemite</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'Spartacus: Vengeance' Review: New Star Lost in Andy Whitfield's Shadow</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/02/03/spartacus-vengeance-review-new-star-lost-in-andy-whitfields-shadow/#IDComment283023927</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think they have much of a show without John Hannah and Andy Whitfield. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/02/03/spartacus-vengeance-review-new-star-lost-in-andy-whitfields-shadow/#IDComment283023927</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Big Movie Flashback: 'Natural Born Killers' (1994)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/16/big-movie-flashback-natural-born-killers-1994/#IDComment267183342</link>
<description>Platoon is to the Viet Nam War as Rocky IV is to heavyweight championship boxing. Oliver Stone&amp;#039;s story of the experience of a US Army platoon in Viet Nam in 1968 is so overdone it&amp;#039;s laughable. While most or all of the occurrences in Platoon did occur over the 10+ year span of US military involvement in Viet Nam, to portray these things happening to one small group of men in such a short time frame (weeks) gives a horribly skewed picture of the war. In Platoon, the men of the platoon see all of the following in the course of a week or two: US soldiers murdering civilians, US Soldiers raping civilians, a US NCO murdering another US NCO, a US Enlisted Man murdering a US SGT, US soldiers killed/wounded by friendly fire, 90%+ killed or wounded in the platoon. For Stone to try to pass this film off as the typical experience of a US soldier in Viet Nam is a disgrace.  It&amp;#039;s the ultimate cartoonish portrayal of the war. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/16/big-movie-flashback-natural-born-killers-1994/#IDComment267183342</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Jim DeMint Is Right: It's Time for a Debate Between Conservatives and Libertarians</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/16/jim-demint-is-right-its-time-for-a-debate-between-conservatives-and-libertarians/#IDComment266382646</link>
<description>I believe quite a few people mislabel themselves as &amp;quot;Libertarian&amp;quot; when what they are really advocating is &amp;quot;Classical Liberalism&amp;quot;. And if you aren&amp;#039;t aware of the differences between Libertarianism, Modern Liberalism and Classical Liberalism I suggest doing some reading on political philosophy.    For what it&amp;#039;s worth, I advocate Fiscal Conservatism, Classical Liberalism and Peace Through Strength.  I strongly advocate AGAINST Modern Liberalism, Statism and the Isolationist approach to foreign affairs. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/16/jim-demint-is-right-its-time-for-a-debate-between-conservatives-and-libertarians/#IDComment266382646</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Big Movie Flashback: 'Natural Born Killers' (1994)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/16/big-movie-flashback-natural-born-killers-1994/#IDComment266378868</link>
<description>One of the most overrated films of the last twenty years.  Viewing it gave me a splitting headache.  And I loved &amp;#039;Pulp Fiction&amp;#039;, Reservoir Dogs&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;Jackie Brown&amp;#039;  (other Tarantino screenplays). </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/16/big-movie-flashback-natural-born-killers-1994/#IDComment266378868</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Push Debunked Romney 'Shoe Shine' Story </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/01/16/progressives-push-debunked-romney-shoe-shine-story/#IDComment266186453</link>
<description>I guess you haven&amp;#039;t flown out of too many small airports. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/01/16/progressives-push-debunked-romney-shoe-shine-story/#IDComment266186453</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Why Is Andrew Sullivan So Dumb?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2012/01/16/why-is-andrew-sullivan-so-dumb/#IDComment266040088</link>
<description>Sullivan, he&amp;#039;s the one who who hired world renowned liar Stephen Glass to write for the The New Republic.  That worked out well. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2012/01/16/why-is-andrew-sullivan-so-dumb/#IDComment266040088</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Would John McCain Put General Patton In Guantanamo?</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/01/15/would-john-mccain-put-general-patton-in-guantanamo/#IDComment265406275</link>
<description>What LTC West said.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/01/15/would-john-mccain-put-general-patton-in-guantanamo/#IDComment265406275</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Paul: We'll Put More Emphasis On Caucus States</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-well-put-more-emphasis-on-caucus-states/#IDComment259236943</link>
<description>I respect your opinion and of course your service but I just don&amp;#039;t like the way Paul&amp;#039;s campaign and many of his supporters try to portray that they are getting overwhelming support from the military when that&amp;#039;s not the case.  I also don&amp;#039;t care for the implication that anyone who does not support Ron Paul is somehow against  (or ignorant regarding) the Constitution.  I&amp;#039;ve read the Constitution from cover to cover (as well as the Federalist Papers and the notes from the Constitutional Conventions) and from what I&amp;#039;ve heard from Rep. Paul, I believe I have a FAR better understanding of the US Constitution than he does. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 06:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-well-put-more-emphasis-on-caucus-states/#IDComment259236943</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Paul: We'll Put More Emphasis On Caucus States</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-well-put-more-emphasis-on-caucus-states/#IDComment259226053</link>
<description>I really wish that Ron Paul supporters would stop implying that current and former Service Members overwhelmingly support Ron Paul. I spent a year in Iraq (&amp;#039;03 to &amp;#039;04) and a year in Afghanistan (&amp;#039;07 to &amp;#039;08) and Ron Paul is easily my least favorite of the current Republican candidates and most of my my fellow veterans I stay in touch with feel the same way.    And spare me the whole spiel about Paul receiving the most in donations from Active Duty Service Members. The way that figure was reached only pertains to donations over $200 (donations below $200 do not require the occupation of the donor to be listed) so that only applies to a TINY fraction of service members overall (the vast majority do not donate at all - they aren&amp;#039;t paid enough) and to only a very small amount of those who actually donated to a campaign (I guarantee you the vast majority of military donors gave less than $200). I would guess that the Active Duty people giving $200+ to the Paul campaign are the shirkers who just want to cash their check every month and never be deployed or get their hands dirty and do what they are trained to do.    Bottom line is most of the guys I served with and deployed with think Paul&amp;#039;s foreign policy views are naive, unrealistic and potentially very dangerous.    Just the opinion of a recently retired LTC from the USACAPOC(A). </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 06:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-well-put-more-emphasis-on-caucus-states/#IDComment259226053</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Heated Exchange Between Paul And Gingrich Over Military Service</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258487419</link>
<description>So I guess that means Paul believes FDR was a &amp;quot;chickenhawk&amp;quot; too.  FDR sent more Americans into harm&amp;#039;s way than every other US President in the 20th Century combined but he never wore the uniform himself even though he could have served in World War I or the even the Spanish American War.  Paul is a desperate buffoon. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258487419</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Heated Exchange Between Paul And Gingrich Over Military Service</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258480516</link>
<description>Ron Paul seems to be getting progressively more and more deranged.   I have seen the types in the military that support him and donate to his dead-end campaign.  They are the shirkers who just want to cash their check every month and never be deployed or do what they are trained to do. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258480516</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Surprise, Surprise: Democrats Join GOP Caucuses to Push Ron Paul </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/01/03/surprise-surprise-democrats-join-gop-caucuses-to-push-ron-paul/#IDComment254530184</link>
<description>One would hope that given he was predicted by many to win Iowa, mostly due to his campaign&amp;#039;s great organization and his very enthusiastic followers, Ron Paul will see his 3rd place finish in tonight as a sign that he has ZERO chance of winning the Republican nomination and a less than ZERO chance of winning a general election and that all his continued presence in the campaign will do is increase Obama&amp;#039;s chance of re-election.    Then again, perhaps Paul would rather see Obama re-elected than see any of the other GOP candidates become President. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Jan 2012 04:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/01/03/surprise-surprise-democrats-join-gop-caucuses-to-push-ron-paul/#IDComment254530184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Surprise, Surprise: Democrats Join GOP Caucuses to Push Ron Paul </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/01/03/surprise-surprise-democrats-join-gop-caucuses-to-push-ron-paul/#IDComment254525623</link>
<description>Their strategy is to help get an un-electable person (in the general election), Ron Paul, to be the GOP nominee so that their man, Obama, can give them even more social benefits. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Jan 2012 04:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/01/03/surprise-surprise-democrats-join-gop-caucuses-to-push-ron-paul/#IDComment254525623</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Iranian Commander: US Aircraft Carrier Better Not Return To the Persian Gulf</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/pschweizer/2012/01/03/iranian-commander-us-aircraft-carrier-better-not-return-to-the-persian-gulf/#IDComment254249820</link>
<description>Do these Iranian morons understand they would be little more than target practice for a US Carrier Battle Group? In a Naval engagement, when one side has 100% air superiority, the other side stands little more chance than a towed target raft.  No matter how hard you pray to Allah, you won&amp;#039;t be invisible to infrared, laser and GPS  targeting. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/pschweizer/2012/01/03/iranian-commander-us-aircraft-carrier-better-not-return-to-the-persian-gulf/#IDComment254249820</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : 29-Dec-11 World View -- U.S. Fifth Fleet Threatens Iran with Retaliation in Strait of Hormuz</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2011/12/29/29-dec-11-world-view-u-s-fifth-fleet-threatens-iran-with-retaliation-in-strait-of-hormuz/#IDComment250023908</link>
<description>What&amp;#039;s with the &amp;#039;76 Lincoln Town Car they&amp;#039;re toting Kim&amp;#039;s corpse around in?   I know they&amp;#039;re a poor country but at least they could afford something from the 80&amp;#039;s or 90&amp;#039;s.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2011/12/29/29-dec-11-world-view-u-s-fifth-fleet-threatens-iran-with-retaliation-in-strait-of-hormuz/#IDComment250023908</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Bing and Bowie: A Christmas Miracle</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mpatterson/2011/12/24/bing-and-bowie-a-christmas-miracle-2/#IDComment246827492</link>
<description>Two of the best vocalists of their respective generations.  Bowie still sounds fantastic today.  One of the most perfect Christmas songs ever. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 09:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mpatterson/2011/12/24/bing-and-bowie-a-christmas-miracle-2/#IDComment246827492</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Paul 1995: 'I Put Out A Political Newsletter' For Education</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-1995-i-put-out-a-political-newsletter-for-education/#IDComment244517863</link>
<description>I will be so happy when this election is over and Ron Paul and Barack Obama (and their supporters) just GO AWAY. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-1995-i-put-out-a-political-newsletter-for-education/#IDComment244517863</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'Homeland' Finale Review: Anti-American to the Core</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kjanke/2011/12/20/homeland-finale-review-anti-american-to-the-core/#IDComment242713670</link>
<description>I haven&amp;#039;t watched a minute of this show since I pressed &amp;quot;Delete&amp;quot; right after I saw Lawrence O&amp;#039;Donnell enter my screen.  Anyone who continued watching after seeing they cast O&amp;#039;Donnell (as himself no less) deserved what they got. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kjanke/2011/12/20/homeland-finale-review-anti-american-to-the-core/#IDComment242713670</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Critics Slam Chelsea Clinton's NBC Debut: "One Of The Most Boring People Of Her Era"</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/13/critics-slam-chelsea-clintons-nbc-debut-one-of-the-most-boring-people-of-her-era/#IDComment237205534</link>
<description>Wow.  Jenna Bush is Walter Winchell compared to poor Chelsea.  The Bride of Frankenstein had more charisma. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/13/critics-slam-chelsea-clintons-nbc-debut-one-of-the-most-boring-people-of-her-era/#IDComment237205534</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Baldwin Does Damage Control - Of Sorts - On 'SNL' for American Airlines Incident</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/12/11/baldwin-does-damage-control-of-sorts-on-snl-for-american-airlines-incident/#IDComment236008605</link>
<description>Can you say &amp;quot;Out of touch with reality&amp;quot;? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/12/11/baldwin-does-damage-control-of-sorts-on-snl-for-american-airlines-incident/#IDComment236008605</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
