In related news, the ad that showed for me before the video posted above pointed out the fact that Ron Paul has raised more than any other current presidential candidate in donations from members of the military - 71% of donations given to any GOP candidate. If you're familiar with Ron Paul's stance on foreign policy, you'll see the direct correlation to this story.
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/07/20/ron-paul-ca...

And I love you.

Hey Ashley,

Check out the comment to Chad above. It's not gone for forever!

Hey Chad,

Sorry to hear that we've disappointed you, but very honored to know that you appreciated the art section of the site. Just a little more info for you... We do plan to relaunch the art section of the site some time in the future with enhanced usability. We were finding that people that our site it built for were having a hard time knowing how to implement the stuff. So, we have some ideas on how to make that better. Once we get the money to make it happen, we'll relaunch that portion. So, come back :)

Awesome, Yana! Can you send some pics?!

Beautiful stuff!!

Good word!

Completely agree. I hoped to communicate some of those ideas in the two examples of the Afghani and American above.

Jared,

Thanks for the post.
To your disagreements.
1. We certainly do not disagree on this point in the least!
2. The cycle of violence comes from
a. The root idea of turning the other cheek
b. Common sense : the only way to end violence is to stop fighting.
3. It's 12:27... I'll come back to this after some sleep.

Boyd,
I'm glad you're passionate about this... And I'm glad we agree. I think you missed the point of the post all together.
The inclusion of the two paragraphs about muslim afghanis and christian americans is to point out the gross misunderstandings of people when viewed from a different context. Hence, the sentence :

"Your history, geography and point of view will determine which phrase you consider to be an attempt to justify acts of terrorism."

It's to say that neither can be seen as terrorism or both can be considered terrorism.

Even if we disagreed (which we do not), I find it interesting that you extrapolated the two statements above to mean "all Afghanis" or "all muslims" or "all christians" or "all americans" when the singular article "a" was intentionally used.

Either I communicated poorly or your read poorly or both... but I'm not sure how you interpreted the exact opposite point from what I was attempting to communicate. My apologies.