<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Chidog's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/643363</link>
		<description>Comments by Chidog</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'Bought &amp; Paid': Have Strat, Will Agitate</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggraham/2011/05/01/bought-paid-have-strat-will-agitate/#IDComment147918354</link>
<description>Yeah,...and I can dance to it, too </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 May 2011 18:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggraham/2011/05/01/bought-paid-have-strat-will-agitate/#IDComment147918354</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Hey Media, How About a Prime Time Obama Investigation?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/04/28/hey-media-how-about-a-prime-time-obama-investigation/#IDComment147760455</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re the simpleton.  &amp;quot;Illinois Republican Senator Jack Ryan was a shoe-in to keep his seat in 2004.&amp;quot;  &lt;b&gt;Fact:&lt;/b&gt; Jack Ryan was never a senator.  &lt;b&gt;Fact:&lt;/b&gt; It was not &amp;quot;his&amp;quot; seat, as the incumbent was Peter Fitzgerald.  &lt;b&gt;Fact:&lt;/b&gt; Republican Fitzgerald was the first Republican to win an IL US Senate race in 20 yrs., beating the Democratic incumbent by less than 3%, mostly because of corruption charges against the Democratic incumbent.  No Republican vying to become a US Senator from IL is a shoe-in.  &lt;b&gt;Fact:&lt;/b&gt; Fitzgerald butted heads with the Republican establishment in IL because he wasn&amp;#039;t simply a yes-man to them. They were more interested in things like protecting corrupt Republicans like former Governor Ryan, who is currently in prison. Read his Wiki page to see that Fitzgerald mostly stood up for the taxpayer.  &lt;b&gt;Fact:&lt;/b&gt; Fitzgerald chose not to run again mostly because he would not have the support of the Republican establishment in IL. They drove out the only Republican able to win in 20 yrs.   Then, without the incumbent advantage, Ryan stepped up. After the fall-out from the &amp;#039;scandal,&amp;#039; with only a couple of months until the election, the idiot Republican establishment picked an outsider to replace Ryan, someone who was not from IL, did not live in IL, and who most Illinoisians knew nothing about.  Alan Keyes.  The people got a quick look at Keyes and voted overwhelmingly for Obama.  Who in their right mind would think Keyes could win in IL? Another bone-headed move by the Republican establishment in IL. They should have picked who came in second in the primary; someone people were familiar with, someone who was from IL for crissakes. Oh, but the &amp;#039;establishment&amp;#039; had issues with him too, apparently.  They handed the election to Obama. Every Republican in IL knows it.  Next time you go calling someone a simpleton, learn the facts first.       </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 May 2011 03:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/04/28/hey-media-how-about-a-prime-time-obama-investigation/#IDComment147760455</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Hey Media, How About a Prime Time Obama Investigation?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/04/28/hey-media-how-about-a-prime-time-obama-investigation/#IDComment147047686</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Illinois Republican Senator Jack Ryan was a shoe-in to keep his seat in 2004...&amp;quot;  Actually, it was not &amp;quot;his seat,&amp;quot; nor was Ryan ever a senator.  The seat had been Peter Fitzgerald&amp;#039;s, the first Republican to have won a US Senate seat from IL in 20 yrs. After one term, he chose not to run again, mainly due to repeatedly butting heads with &amp;#039;Republican leadership&amp;#039; in IL.  It was the inept and corrupt &amp;#039;Republican leadership&amp;#039; in IL that handed Obama the senate seat (and thus, the presidency) when they drove out the incumbent. Again, Fitzgerald was the first Republican US Senator from IL in  20 yrs.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/04/28/hey-media-how-about-a-prime-time-obama-investigation/#IDComment147047686</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today's Open Thread: #16 Henry Fonda</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/28/todays-open-thread-16-henry-fonda/#IDComment138128040</link>
<description>He&amp;#039;s been in many movies I really like and though a fine actor, he just doesn&amp;#039;t have the &amp;#039;it&amp;#039; factor for me, the charisma, the uniqueness. Franky, I can see other actors paying many of his roles. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/28/todays-open-thread-16-henry-fonda/#IDComment138128040</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Free and Fair Elections: True The Vote Style</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2011/03/26/free-and-fair-elections-true-the-vote-style/#IDComment137831139</link>
<description>Recently, neighbors in my area were organizing to change what school district kids in our area attend. We live in a city with a good school district, but live in a small area that belongs to a school district in a neighboring village which isn&amp;#039;t as good.  Anyway, the first required step was to secure the signatures of 90% of homeowners who support th change.  They got the signatures and brought them to the appropriate authorities. It turns out that the list the &amp;#039;authorities&amp;#039; use is a list of registered voters in our area, not a list of actual homeowners.  It turns out that many people who are still on the active voter rolls are dead or have moved away. The organizers said they would bring proof of the current occupiers/owners of homes, but the &amp;#039;authorities&amp;#039; said that wouldn&amp;#039;t do-they had to go by the official registered voter list-and the organizers would have to go to &amp;#039;other authorities&amp;#039; to get the registered voter list updated.  This goes to show you two things; registered voter lists are messed up everywhere and it&amp;#039;s ordinary citizens who have to take action to straighten this mess out.  Has anyone been voting in the name of the these dead people? Are people who have moved voting in more than one place? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2011/03/26/free-and-fair-elections-true-the-vote-style/#IDComment137831139</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Four-Star Review for 'The Kennedys': 'Best Miniseries You Almost Weren't Allowed to See'</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/26/four-star-review-for-the-kennedys-best-miniseries-you-almost-werent-allowed-to-see/#IDComment137771614</link>
<description>I get Reelz but don&amp;#039;t have HBO, so the switch works for me. Looking forward to watching it. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/26/four-star-review-for-the-kennedys-best-miniseries-you-almost-werent-allowed-to-see/#IDComment137771614</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : FLASHBACK: Aaron Sorkin's Vicious Ad Hominem Attack on Sarah Palin Published on AOL/HuffPo</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/flashback-aaron-sorkins-vicious-ad-hominem-attack-on-sarah-palin-published-on-aolhuffpo/#IDComment137641706</link>
<description>HuffPo/AOL has so embarrassed itself with this blatant hypocrisy. The site is a laughingstock and is obviously geared to compete idiots. That&amp;#039;s why I have canceled my account. 5 minutes spent on that site is 5 minutes too long.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/flashback-aaron-sorkins-vicious-ad-hominem-attack-on-sarah-palin-published-on-aolhuffpo/#IDComment137641706</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Bret Baier Gets Jon Stewart to Admit Fox Does Hard News</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/bret-baier-gets-jon-stewart-to-admit-fox-does-hard-news/#IDComment137636596</link>
<description>Ha ha!  And what does &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; response, according to your own standard, tell me?  That you are our own worst enemy! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/bret-baier-gets-jon-stewart-to-admit-fox-does-hard-news/#IDComment137636596</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Bret Baier Gets Jon Stewart to Admit Fox Does Hard News</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/bret-baier-gets-jon-stewart-to-admit-fox-does-hard-news/#IDComment137634659</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;advice&amp;#039; fool! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/bret-baier-gets-jon-stewart-to-admit-fox-does-hard-news/#IDComment137634659</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Charles Krauthammer: Jon Stewart Rally 'whitest of all rallies ever held' in DC</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/24/charles-krauthammer-jon-stewart-rally-whitest-of-all-rallies-ever-held-in-dc/#IDComment137395437</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;No one wanted to come with me to either of Beck&amp;#039;s rallies, but virtually &lt;b&gt;everyone I know&lt;/b&gt; was at the Stewart/Colbert rally.&lt;/i&gt;  Amusing that you talk about diversity, yet clearly surround yourself with people who mostly see everything as you do.  BTW, DC is overwhelmingly Democrat, so a Democrat driven event is more easily able to attract a crowd solely due to logistics. Oh, and free bus rides never hurt either.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/24/charles-krauthammer-jon-stewart-rally-whitest-of-all-rallies-ever-held-in-dc/#IDComment137395437</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Todayâs Open Thread: #20 Charlton Heston</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/24/todays-open-thread-20-burt-lancaster/#IDComment137244506</link>
<description>On a really shallow note, he was one of the damn finest looking men to ever grace the big screen. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/03/24/todays-open-thread-20-burt-lancaster/#IDComment137244506</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Editor On WI Union Violence: 'You Reap What You Sow'</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/21/milwaukee-journal-sentinel-editor-on-wi-union-violence-you-reap-what-you-sow/#IDComment136912963</link>
<description>Your WTMJ blog link goes to an anti-Charlie Sykes site. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 03:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/21/milwaukee-journal-sentinel-editor-on-wi-union-violence-you-reap-what-you-sow/#IDComment136912963</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Video: Comedian Explains Why You Can't Mock Obama</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/21/video-comedian-explains-why-you-cant-mock-obama/#IDComment136649510</link>
<description>LMAO!   Everything you&amp;#039;ve written is &lt;i&gt;clearly&lt;/i&gt; a reflection of how you feel about yourself.  Who would spend so much time thinking up such a barrage of insults? No one.  It&amp;#039;&amp;#039;s &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; someone who knows them like the back of their hand because they&amp;#039;ve been repeating them to themselves for years.  Try and be more subtle next time. Your oh-so-obvious self-hatred really undermines your trolling abilities. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/21/video-comedian-explains-why-you-cant-mock-obama/#IDComment136649510</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Twenty Most Overrated Films of All Time: Part II</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2011/03/20/twenty-most-overrated-films-of-all-time-part-ii/#IDComment136360070</link>
<description>You appear to have the emotional maturity of a 2 yr. old.  You said a lot of stupid things, but the most idiotic was &amp;quot;They are not considered overrated by everyone.&amp;quot;  Obviously, if they were considered over-rated by everyone, they wouldn&amp;#039;t have been highly rated and thus, no need for &amp;#039;the most over-rated films.&amp;#039;  There are legions of people (with taste) who agree with several of his selections. It appears &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; are the ego-maniac who thinks your opinion is the only truth.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2011/03/20/twenty-most-overrated-films-of-all-time-part-ii/#IDComment136360070</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Twenty Most Overrated Films of All Time: Part II</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2011/03/20/twenty-most-overrated-films-of-all-time-part-ii/#IDComment136353804</link>
<description>The Graduate is an absolutely boring and stupid movie.   American Beauty sucked.  Titanic-beyond the spectacle of it, it was awful.  Fargo I liked.  The Usual Suspects-I&amp;#039;ve seen twice and am still confused.  Some Like It Hot-like it, but it&amp;#039;s not great.  Pulp Fiction-I have never seen it and have no interest in seeing it.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2011/03/20/twenty-most-overrated-films-of-all-time-part-ii/#IDComment136353804</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : We Live In a Digital Heyday</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmandaville/2011/03/20/the-digital-heyday/#IDComment136349820</link>
<description>I understand what you&amp;#039;re saying about &amp;#039;time&amp;#039;, but the &amp;quot;new age&amp;quot; doesn&amp;#039;t devolve into simply more movies, but is about the &amp;#039;who&amp;#039;--about who has the opportunity to produce and star in them.   I&amp;#039;m not even sure I wholly agree with your &amp;#039;time&amp;#039; theory anyway. Can any one person watch the hundreds of cable channels available to them? No, but they must be finding enough of a niche market to survive. No one prson needs to consume it all. When you have a potential world-wide market, you need to capture only a very small slice to be profitable. Even the US has millions of more people now than 10 yrs. ago.  And look at the internet. 15 yrs. ago, hardly anyone was online. People sure have found time for it now. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 03:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmandaville/2011/03/20/the-digital-heyday/#IDComment136349820</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : In Second Week, Pro-Military 'Battle: Los Angeles' Beats Debut of Christian-Trashing 'Paul'</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136238279</link>
<description>Propping up BAD movies?  I can name numerous BAD movies critics have propped up. In fact, you&amp;#039;re as boring and predictable as one of those BAD movies I watched because critics raved about it; The Brothers McMullen.  UGH! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136238279</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : In Second Week, Pro-Military 'Battle: Los Angeles' Beats Debut of Christian-Trashing 'Paul'</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136150071</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s time to go to bed, junior. You can listen to your Hannah Montana CDs tomorrow and perhaps you&amp;#039;ll have a better day.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 01:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136150071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : In Second Week, Pro-Military 'Battle: Los Angeles' Beats Debut of Christian-Trashing 'Paul'</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136141260</link>
<description>LOL!  I have really enjoyed owning you here and in reveling in your continuing insistence in revealing yourself as a complete idiot.  BTW, idiot, I am not a &amp;quot;bro.&amp;quot; Really, can&amp;#039;t you stop being such a simple-minded fool? A clown such as yourself can be entertaining, but the repetitive joke that you are has become boring now.     </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136141260</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : In Second Week, Pro-Military 'Battle: Los Angeles' Beats Debut of Christian-Trashing 'Paul'</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136125960</link>
<description>Obviously, you&amp;#039;ve even been rejected by fat girls.    </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/19/in-second-week-pro-military-battle-los-angeles-beats-debut-of-christian-trashing-paul/#IDComment136125960</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
