Brewster

Brewster

81p

29 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

65 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Keith Olbermann Return... · 0 replies · +2 points

More than that is the inherent difference between conservatives and liberals - that being consistency. Free speech is free speech no matter who it concerns. The argument that some made that his "banning" was because he broke a rule of employment - not because he donated - is a red herring. Citizens have a right to donate to the persons or parties they choose to. Nobody in their right mind would have suspected that Olberdouche would donate to conservative Republicans anymore than Glenn Beck would donate to the DNCC. Let's be honest here - let's be consistent.

66 weeks ago @ Freedom Watch With The... - 10/30/2010 Freedom Wat... · 2 replies · +1 points

If you folks want to get an idea (like you needed it) what the unhinged left is up to now - try clicking on the video twice and checking out the comments at the YouTube channel!
Insanity thrives at the left side.

66 weeks ago @ Freedom Watch With The... - 10/30/2010 Freedom Wat... · 1 reply · 0 points

That's up to YouTube to do - not the Judge.

66 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - YouTube yanks Islamic ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Nice catch, Ann. That bolsters my opinion that the "Google Gang" is a rancid bunch of leftist punks. Of course this is why they fit in so nicely with Obama and Company. Birds of a Feather and all that. I have written about this at some length in my blog.

In short - if you run a blog or website - avoid any widget having to do with Google. Use another service as your search engine no matter what. I use bing.com or ask.com.

66 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - YouTube yanks Islamic ... · 1 reply · +1 points

Perhaps it's you who needs an education on how to use the functions. When you clicked "reply", your reply is intended for what *I* commented on - not on the subject of the article. What you should have entered your post in is the "post new comment" at the very bottom. You are constructing an entirely new proposition, thus you should not have "replied" to my post.
I well understand both Webster and the meaning or correlation. Do you?

66 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - YouTube yanks Islamic ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Free speech is guaranteed to American citizens, moonbeam - not foreign nationals - though the Obowba regime seems to think so. And you, of course. So you're in favor of allowing these scumbags to post recruitment videos and videos showing American soldiers bodies being dragged through streets, beheaded, or burned? You really ARE a moron, then.

66 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - YouTube yanks Islamic ... · 3 replies · +1 points

Sorry - but your posit has absolutely nothing to do with the issue of YouTube/Google and jihadi videos.

66 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - YouTube yanks Islamic ... · 5 replies · +29 points

The "YouTube Smackdown" project - of which I and hundreds of others are members - has been after YouTube/Google to remove these jihadi videos for years without success. Like a previous commenter noted - they quickly remove videos *they claim* violate their "terms of use", which includes advocating violence and/or hate. It seems YuTube/Googles idea of violence and/or hate is far different for Muslims and liberals than it is for conservative Americans. But then the punks who run Google are in the pocket of Obama liberalism and have been since the beginning.

67 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - FBI suspects disgruntl... · 0 replies · +1 points

Yeah - and we all know with certainty how accurate the FBI profilers have been historically, don't we. What did they have to say about the Atlanta shooter? A disgruntled white guy or something like that? A former serviceman, maybe?

Amazing that the FBI can "profile" something like this, but can't profile arabs getting on aircraft. No - American citizens, little old ladies, babies in diapers, and Medal of Honor recipients get braced instead. Arabs walk on planes shouting Allahu Akbar without any problem. GREAT job, FBI!

70 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - US could absorb a terr... · 0 replies · +1 points

Sarah - I read through your comments at Breitbart. You sound like my kind of gal, and God bless you.

As to GWB, I have had stories related to me by good friends in the military and/or currently in treatment for war injuries that the media never reported (nor did GWB desire them to) nor mentioned by anyone in his administration - and he what you said - the real deal. While I too disagree (sometimes vehemently) with his domestic policies, the fact remains his regard for those men and women serving and dying for us was second to none. I know he and Laura would visit the hospitals regularly, unannounced, and spend hours with the troops and there families - just talking, giving encouragement, and praying with them. He was and is a good and very decent man - unlike the character now in office, to our great shame.

His main failings were going along with the Dems rather than standing firm on conservative principles.