<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Atheist Jew's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/68681</link>
		<description>Comments by The Atheist Jew</description>
<item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Atheism Is Not A Religion</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2012/02/atheism-is-not-religion.html#IDComment292241346</link>
<description>Is it a belief based system to not believe in the Easter Bunny, Leprechauns or Santa Claus?  No.  And lack of belief in those three individuals is based on rationality. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2012/02/atheism-is-not-religion.html#IDComment292241346</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : PENN AND TELLER: THE BIBLE IS CRAPOLA</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment273495811</link>
<description>There is no evidence for God, in fact, no contemporary evidence for a historical Jesus.  When you die, you die, and I don&amp;#039;t need a Christ puncher or devout Muslim to tell me to worship their bible and God or else.  It is utter crap.  You are wasting your valuable existence worshiping a myth.  If you need the crutch, so be it, but leave me out of your mythological nonsense. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment273495811</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : PENN AND TELLER: THE BIBLE IS CRAPOLA</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272415586</link>
<description>I will be deleting your posts for now on.  Peddle your nonsense somewhere else clown. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272415586</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : PENN AND TELLER: THE BIBLE IS CRAPOLA</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272414843</link>
<description>Look imbecile, I&amp;#039;m done with you.  You are a clown.  A reality denier.  Watch Potholer54&amp;#039;s videos and learn or don&amp;#039;t learn, my lurkers will watch them though.  Idiot.  Get lost. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272414843</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : PENN AND TELLER: THE BIBLE IS CRAPOLA</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272346283</link>
<description>Yes I saw the video LOLOLOL  I&amp;#039;ve also seen many videos on the topic.  A reality denying Fundy simpleton like yourself really wastes my time. Why the Ark is BS:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/02/flood-story-of-genesis-6-9.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/02...&lt;/a&gt; It is impossible to have happened.    And again, they won&amp;#039;t let scientists near the Arafat wood pile.  I wonder why. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272346283</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : PENN AND TELLER: THE BIBLE IS CRAPOLA</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272129285</link>
<description>It is bullshit, Doofus.  There is no scientific evidence for the Flood.  The story is ridiculous and makes no sense with what science knows. As for the discovery, they won&amp;#039;t let scientists look at it or analyse it.  It is a fraud. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment272129285</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : PENN AND TELLER: THE BIBLE IS CRAPOLA</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment271500241</link>
<description>Bullshit!  There is absolutely no evidence for the Flood.  It is a children&amp;#039;s story that adults fall for.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2006/04/penn-and-teller-bible-is-crapola.html#IDComment271500241</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Study:  Atheists Aren't Trusted That Much</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2012/01/study-atheists-arent-trusted-that-much.html#IDComment268886933</link>
<description>I think both tend to try lets say get the most out of you financially, I just think that you might get a bit of a break from a churchgoer most of the time, and they might find less problems that don&amp;#039;t exist. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2012/01/study-atheists-arent-trusted-that-much.html#IDComment268886933</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment265312133</link>
<description>I started a thread on Atheist Nexus, about your trolling.  The response was given in that thread.  The fact you refuse to deal with the rebuttal proves you are nothing but a troll. Bye troll. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment265312133</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment263198961</link>
<description>I added the hyperlink because the person who sent it to me included it.  It was a reply he made in another forum and thought it was very relevent to the silliness you are stating here.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment263198961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment263198008</link>
<description>It is about time you waved the white flag.  It doesn&amp;#039;t matter if I refute you in my own words or someone eles, the fact is you are refuted. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment263198008</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262813014</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t know why I always assumed he was an ethnic Jew. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262813014</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Noah's Ark And The Great Flood LMAO</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2010/01/noahs-ark-and-great-flood-lmao.html#IDComment262763546</link>
<description>There is no evidence for the Ark or anything supernatural.  Oh wait the bible?  Yeah, God also made the Cat in the Hat talk. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2010/01/noahs-ark-and-great-flood-lmao.html#IDComment262763546</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262760864</link>
<description>Jujuman, here is a reply by someone who for some reason doesn&amp;#039;t want to sign in with the commentary service I use:    1:  A summary of&lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.atheistnexus.org\/forum\/topics\/convincing-a-christian-that-the-jesus-story-is-false\?xg_source=activity&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; this thread&lt;/a&gt; is: a pedantic conversation about the meaning of words in different circles of thought. A key point of confusion that I have had (not necessarily incorrectly either) is that technically and by most dictionaries the word &amp;#039;atheist&amp;#039; is the opposite of &amp;#039;theist&amp;#039;, just as is the case with &amp;#039;symmetrical&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;asymmetrical&amp;#039;. The words agnostic and atheist are a little foggy- I&amp;#039;ve been told that in philosophical circles the meanings differ quite a bit. Safe to say that anyone who calls themselves an atheist is not someone who has an irrational belief in their being no deity without having some strong proof. For one, this it is (probably) impossible to prove, and another is that it would be almost as absurd as believing that there is a deity without having some strong proof. &amp;#039;Atheism&amp;#039; is simply a tag under which rational and reasonable people assemble under- so many diverse people that a single tag could never hope to be totally sufficient- in order to discuss all sorts of matters in a rational and reasonable way.    2:  Scientific theory is not a belief. It is humanity&amp;#039;s only tool for obtaining reliable knowledge in this universe. It has been refined over the ages to be more resilient to the inheritance weaknesses in the human mind and more robust against all biases. It cares not for whether results are intuitive or counter-intuitive, or for proving or disproving it&amp;#039;s users&amp;#039; hypothesis. It&amp;#039;s a candle in the dark of irrationality and the unknown.    3:   You are being simultaneously ignorant, antagonistic and pedantic. Although in a way this is an impressive feat, it is also counter productive and reveals an &amp;#039;us-vs-them&amp;#039; attitude. Atheism is not out to destroy theism- it is only a strict adherence to rationalism and reason. If belief systems are contradicted either by the methods or discoveries of logic and rational scientific experimentation it is not an attack on theism- merely a by-product of knowledge being obtained in a reliable and unbiased method. Without such methods you would not be sitting at a computer being an irritation, you silly monkey. BAD monkey! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262760864</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262642282</link>
<description>Here is another quote from the internet.  &amp;quot;Belief is based on accepting what someone or something has told you without any corroboration (supporting evidence, third-party accounts, backups). Scientific theory is based on experiment and logic, and usually can be tested with extremely accurate predictions.&amp;quot;  Atheism and scientific theory are not beliefs.  Now keep pounding your chest, it is funny. As for agnostics, I would say an agnostic is someone who states they don&amp;#039;t know (meaning they give the idea that God exists a probability higher than .001).  I could also argue that all theists are agnostic as well depending on the definition used.  It is not a belief that I don&amp;#039;t believe in Leprechauns or an invisible man under my bed.  A belief has no concrete evidence that backs up a premise.  It is not a belief when you dismiss a premise because there is absolutely no concrete evidence to support it.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262642282</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262261695</link>
<description>The definition clearly proves that atheism is not a belief, but you can pound your chest all you want.  It is a disease you theists have called willful ignorance. Scientific theory and belief are not even close to each other no matter matter how much you need them to be. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment262261695</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment261666841</link>
<description>From another site.  Looks like I can get around it, not that it matters because you can invent meanings to any word you want and not accept actual definitions: The Macquarie Encyclopedic Dictionary definition of &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot; is:  1. that which is believed; an accepted opinion. 2. conviction of the truth or reality of a thing, based upon grounds insufficient to afford positive knowledge:  Most other Dictionaries tender similar definitions.  Those definitions are basically saying that a &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot; is not formed by critical scientific investigation but by emotions, feelings and unsubstantiated opinion.  As a child I can hold a &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot; that the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus are real characters. I can have a &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot; that Unicorns exist and that Ghosts and Goblins etc. are also real.  As an adult I can hold a &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot; that any one of the numerous gods purported, do actually exist, and that humans have an immortal &amp;quot;soul&amp;quot;. Some even have a &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot; in UFO&amp;#039;s, the power of crystals and a myriad of other unproven paranormal activity.  Atheists do not accept that any of the above imaginary creatures or powers do exist as no scientific evidence is extant in support of those propositions. This is not a &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot;, it is just lack of scientific evidence in their support. *************************  As for the God Particle, it will either be proven or it won&amp;#039;t over the next little while.  Unlike God, who will never be proven because man invented him/her/it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment261666841</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment261255379</link>
<description>Atheism is a lack of belief.  Again, I don&amp;#039;t have total knowledge about Leprechauns.  It is possible they can exist just like it is possible there is an invisible man who lives under my bed and does absolutely nothing.  However there is zero evidence for God, the Leprechaun or the man under my bed so if you ask me if I think any of them exist, my answer is no to all. It is impossible to have absolute knowledge of the universe, but if you make the claim that a God or a Leprechaun exists, it is up to you to prove it, until then, I&amp;#039;m an atheist. As for Higgs Boson, the God particle has nothing to do with God...I suggest using Google and a little reading comprehension before spamming the internet with your &amp;quot;knowledge.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment261255379</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment261252020</link>
<description>One theory is that energy could always have existed.  There are quite a few theories out there, I suggest you educate yourself on them as to how matter was created in the universe. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment261252020</guid>
</item><item>
<title>THE ATHEIST JEW : Seth MacFarlane Is An Atheist (Not To Be A Dick)</title>
<link>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment250841154</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not a college grad.  I did go to university for 3 years though, just didn&amp;#039;t earn enough credits in my major.  I don&amp;#039;t think atheism comes about in university, but high school.   Existential novels in English and learning basic science can open ones eyes up. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/2009/03/seth-macfarlane-is-atheist-not-to-be.html#IDComment250841154</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
