And go back and read what I've written. I haven't talked **** about him. I'm just telling you the facts as the newspapers and television news programs are stating them, and I asked you a specific question.

Okay, so now instead of the story about him killing someone in 2009 being a LIE (as you claimed it to be) you're saying IF he killed someone in 2009? Which is it? Is every single television station and newspaper LYING or did he also kill someone in 2009? I'd just like a straight answer out of you.

When you say that the media is "lying" about this guy NOT KILLING a woman in 2009, you are not telling the truth, honey. He did kill someone in 2009 because he was speeding and weaving in and out of traffic. There were lots of witnesses. His sentence was suspended for that death. You can say it's a lie all day long, but it doesn't change anything. He killed someone else in 2009. What I asked you is was that death ALSO caused by a seizure?

Okay, so now I know you're the liar. Shame on you. Three people are dead, and this isn't a joke. It isn't a lie. It's verifiably true. The story about "your relative" killing someone in 2009 is now on every television station too.

I just read in the Seattle Times that the man who was driving the SUV that killed the couple had killed another woman in 2009! In that case, he was also driving far too fast and weaving in and out of traffic. His punishment was suspended and now two more people are dead. To the relative who has been screaming at upset noters on another article about this, claiming the driver had a seizure and he's innocent, I am asking you: Did he have a seizure the first time he killed someone too?

Here is a link to the article: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2...

My husband and I drove past this accident (going the other way, however) on our way back from a visit to Tri-Cities. I have never seen anything like this accident. That car was so smashed that it was unrecognizable. I doubt if it was 4-feet long, it was so pancaked. We estimated that the semi that hit it must not have even used his brakes. Horrific.

Save the whiles!

Why do you have to idle?

I'm pretty sure you can turn off the car while you wait, Kindearth.

Not only am I puzzled about why we should know that the man reporting to the police was dresses as a pirate, but why would the police consider it neglectful that the children didn't have food in a car? I don't normally stock my car with food. Do you?
I' m glad the pirate reported this person and the children are safe.