I live in Iowa and it feel likes this race is about more than Ron Paul and libertarianism, it's about white America's last stand. The fact that Iowa is being demonized over being one of the last of the predominantly white American states is rather telling.

At any rate, I'll do my part to help Ron tomorrow, even if I don't want to sit down and listen to people speak and argue over party platforms. It's only fair, after sitting in the sidelines and watching you guys work towards getting the BNP elected for the last 2 years.

God bless you, Mr Dowson. :)

Bravo for coming to this conclusion, Britain First. I hope this fine organization goes beyond political activism (which is a commendable activity of course), and engages in community building; ie bringing the native British people closer together. Rallying around Emma West was the first brave step in that direction. I also think it would be a good idea for Britain First to have cultural activities to help build up British pride and identity.

Like Steven, I can only be there in spirit. But I wish you guys the best of luck in standing up for your kinswoman. If there's any shred of dignity left in the British people, they will wake up and rebel against terrible injustice.

David Duke isn't legally allowed to run for president because of his guilty plea for tax evasion. In the US that automatically disqualifies you.

Roger could certainly enter politics, but imagine what good he could for his people by using his music to promote nationalism?

Green Arrow is right about there being only one true definition of nationalism. If one studies the root of nation, it comes from Latin, meaning "that which is born". The very term has an ethnic/racial connotation, and thus ethnonationalism is technically a tautology.

Unfortunately, I feel the usage of term is necessary, because the very concept of nation has been rewritten in the West to mean a physical State, rather than an organic community/tribe with shared blood memory. Whilst allowing civic and cultural nationalists to hijack the very meaning of nationalism is a victory for them, at the same time, we as a people have allowed the misuse of term nation to go on for a decades. Having to call ourselves ethnonationalist is the only way we can be clear that we represent true historic nationalism.

What are the British waiting for? Form ethnic communities of your own to resist this onslaught. Whites are nothing more than cattle when they are isolated, easy pickings. United, they can form a mighty buffalo herd, able to drive off any attacking predators.

The threat of miscegenation is one reason why I feel that cultural nationalism is dangerous, because when you say ethnic groups exist, and yet they have the same culture, you end up bringing down the distinctiveness of said ethnic groups, opening the door to miscegenation. After all, if our cultures are the same, then how can we be truly different, and then we must ask what's wrong with mass mixing?

We must maintain the distinctiveness of our ethnicities by upholding our cultures as ours and ours alone. If other peoples want to borrow ideas or customs, then that's fine, but that doesn't mean that they have our culture.

"But, this is precisely the state of Marxist Liberal political thinking and strategy at the moment and has been so for at least the past thirty years. Can you not see that this is what is causing our present considerably troubling situation? It's called multiculturalism which has just recently been denounced by some European government including the current UK Prime minister.

Common sense should indicate to those even of average intelligence that it is not possible to permanently retain one's territory, heritage, culture, language and belief system if there are myriad alien races and their respective cultures/belief systems amassed within one's indigenous living space(s). I am sure it is not necessary for me to cite the various reasons as to why it is indeed impossible with just two examples being human competitiveness and the question of combined multiracial population proliferation causing the out-numbering of the single individual homogenous indigenous ethnicities. Well! "

I'm not a fan of multiculturalism, but were I to choose between multiculturalism and integration, I'd pick multiculturalism any day. I'd much rather maintain distinction between the races and ethnic groups than see David Cameron, Geert Wilders, or your typical hack Republican over here in the States try to melt everyone together into a new "Western" propositional identity.

"
Are you seriously suggesting that the four indigenous British nations each be expected to breed at the combined rate of every alien ethnicity amassed upon their indigenous territories in a race to retain their own respective British homelands? It would be utterly impossible and I rather suspect you know that fine well - hence your attempts at trying to hoodwink and belittle the intelligence of the indigenous peoples of the UK. "

It's not likely to happen, but it's really the only weapon they have when they are forced to live in a multiracial society. Whoever has the most babies determines who's in control, for the most part. But with white birth rates being as bad as they are, native British don't have much time left to mobilize and get enough momentum in politics and start a repatriation program. Hence why I feel nationalists need to readjust their tactics from focusing on politics to focusing on community and building a new sense of tribalism amongst the indigenous, so that when they do become a minority, they will be able to unite and form a shield wall, securing a future for their people.

Do you have any other questions?