The words Muslims use to describe Jews ("apes", "pigs") sound such as
to make it seems as if they wouldn't be truly able to accept
conversions - I'm also thinking of "Jameela"'s spamming...

It's best BY FAR to NEVER enter a mosque under positively ANY circumstances!!! Better yet, NEVER travel to any Muslim country and shun those Muslims who've already infested your country as traitors who shouldn't be in the West anyway!!!! That these Dutchie-"royals" entered the mosque - and who to boot and much worse are leftist in sympathy even to the point of participating in and encouraging the persecution of Mr. Geert Wilders - proves who they really are in terms of "dhimmi"-tude!!!!

Only those people who renounce Islâm and who can PROVE they're Westernised (by demonstrating musical, artistic and/or scientific ability) should be allowed to stay in the West (and even then, they should be subjected to a good long period of monitoring and surveillance - I suggest 12 years!!); everybody else MUST BE DEPORTED back to where they or their ancestors came from!!! Islâm has positively NO PLACE in the West, PERIOD!!!!

Shun ALL Muslim businesses, avoid selling anything to those throat-slitters that can in the slightest aid them into settling in your area, forbid them to spread their literature and advertisement - and in short ensure that they realise they are unwelcome where you are!!!

Truly!!!!

I only wish that "judge" could be forced to live in a Muslim country for a minimum of TEN WHOLE CALENDAR YEARS - perhaps afterwards he would know better!!!! [If not, let the exile be permanent (for the rest of his life!!!) - the best thing we can do to Muslims and Commies is to deport them ALL, ideally without papers, and plonk them down in places where they would really have a hard time communicating with their new neighbours...]

Ha ha ha ha ha!!!! "In marijuana veritas" - in other words, being intoxicated with that substance brought out his true Muslim nature...

Good points, Southwood!!! That in itself shows you how Muslims are quite racist at heart, more so than any whites other than those in "supremacist" groups like the Nazis, KKK or things of that sort!!!

In fact, the word in Arabic for "black" ("abd") is also used to denote "slave" and possibly even "filth" (if I recall correctly).

Furthermore, Muslims in Niger, Sudan, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere STILL take and purchase slaves!!! "Since Muhammad was a slave owner and slavery is permitted by the Qur'ân, the Muslim world has never apologized for this dehumanizing practice. Even [nowadays], Muslims in the West will often try to justify slavery under Islam, since it is a part of the Qur'ân." (from "The Religion of Peace" website)

In theory, Esther, you're indeed right; however, in actual fact Islâm very much favours the Arabs and looks down upon blacks. Furthermore, given how the Hadiths have Mohammed looking down upon blacks to such an extent as to think of them as slaves - in addition to how Jews are described as "descendants of pigs and apes" - I can't see how Islâm can truly avoid the label of "a racial religion".

This article from "The Religion of Peace" website can buttress what I've written above: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Articles/Blacka....

I don't believe Muslims would care about somebody of Jewish stock being raised as a Muslim or being one: they're required to kill them anyway as INHUMAN by the dictates of Mohammed!!! When somebody's that dehumanised, no conversion will be accepted - it's just like with the Nazis.

Good for those MPs and peers who've rejected "halal" food!!! NEVER should it be served ideally anywhere outside of Muslim communities, which by definition should not be present in the West, period!!!!

Good stuff!!! The right thing that should in fact be done is that Muslims are NOT welcome in shops to buy ANYTHING - food, medicines, goods, services, absolutely nothing other than a ONE-WAY ticket back to their original countries!!!

Converts would be deported to Saudi Arabia or Irân depending on whether they are Sunni or Shi'ite. Furthermore, if they offer the least sign of any resistance, they should be forcibly sent to the Islâmic world without ANY PAPERS WHATSOEVER - if necessary, even by parachute or glider.

Dear Southwood:

Much as I agree with you about the KJV being absolutely outstanding - it's usually the first version to which I turn although I have a number of others, I still have two concerns: 1) the absence of the Apocrypha (which Orthodox, Catholics and many Anglicans accept), 2) damning all the others, particularly those which were worked up to ca. 1975.

Regarding the second point: anything post-1975 is 'ipso facto' suspect on account of Marxism and its shibboleths like "inclusivity" creeping in; however, I'm uneasy about really despising the work of Tyndale (over 80% of the King James Bible derives from him), the Catholic scholars that produced the Douai-Reims version (although it often sticks too closely to Latin instead of being real English) or the Presbyterians and Calvinists who produced the "Geneva Bible."

[At home, in addition to the King James Version, yours truly also has the NIV, NRSV (this one I NEVER use as truly being heretical and "PC"!!), Living Bible, NASB {New Testament, Psalms & Proverbs only}, Jerusalem Bible, Monsignor Knox, Douai-Reims - last 3 for Deuterocanonical books (Apocrypha) particularly. Online he also likes to consult the NKJV; furthermore he also has a Bible in Russian.]