<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>All Blog Comments</title>		<language>en-us</language>		<link>http://realstorygroup.com</link>		<description>All comments from Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports</description><item>
<author>SEM</author><title>SEM - Insert SharePoint Joke Here... | Real Story Group</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2672-Insert-SharePoint-Joke-Here...#IDComment802821582</link><description>Every dollar you spend on SharePoint will yield $6 - $9 in sunken treasure. </description><pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2014 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2672-Insert-SharePoint-Joke-Here...#IDComment802821582</guid></item><item>
<author>Tony - RSG</author><title>Tony - RSG - Insert SharePoint Joke Here... | Real Story Group</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2672-Insert-SharePoint-Joke-Here...#IDComment801983537</link><description>&amp;quot;We&amp;#039;re sorry, this helicopter has been checked out by someone else...&amp;quot; </description><pubDate>Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:16:20 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2672-Insert-SharePoint-Joke-Here...#IDComment801983537</guid></item><item>
<author>Kevin</author><title>Kevin - OpenText RedDot - Three Years Later... &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2502-OpenText-RedDot-Three-Years-Later...#IDComment801933720</link><description>Right on the mark, but unfortunately our organization is determined to be the last US subscriber. The link to  to a &amp;quot;copy of the last update we did to our RedDot chapter, in late 2009&amp;quot; is dead.  Do you have this available online somewhere? </description><pubDate>Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:47:08 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2502-OpenText-RedDot-Three-Years-Later...#IDComment801933720</guid></item><item>
<author>@adriaanbloem</author><title>@adriaanbloem - The Case Against Adobe CQ - WEM &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2563-The-Case-Against-Adobe-CQ-WEM#IDComment801496541</link><description>I&amp;#039;ve been hearing about CQ&amp;#039;s success in the U.S. from halfway across the globe (yes, the noise around it is that loud). And it worried me. I think this about sums it up; &amp;quot;Successful CQ licensees tend to have extremely strong internal teams: large, well-oiled technical development shops, exceptionally tight program and vendor management, and above-average digital sophistication on the business side.&amp;quot;  We all wish we&amp;#039;re like that. But let&amp;#039;s face it, most teams are at least slightly dysfunctional -- it almost comes with the territory, aiming at that moving target that is online marketing.  I really like complex, sophisticated systems like CQ. But I&amp;#039;d still think twice about buying into it. </description><pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:44:50 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2563-The-Case-Against-Adobe-CQ-WEM#IDComment801496541</guid></item><item>
<author>Elizabeth Keathley</author><title>Elizabeth Keathley - The Case Against Adobe CQ - WEM &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2563-The-Case-Against-Adobe-CQ-WEM#IDComment800651505</link><description>Adobe&amp;#039;s scambled offering in the DAM space has me scratching my head as to why they are a gold sponsor at the upcoming DAM convention.  Not only does Adobe&amp;#039;s system end up costing clients buckets of money, it lacks scalability due to lack of ID Codes, limited folder space, and an outdated (Lucene) index system. </description><pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2014 21:11:09 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2563-The-Case-Against-Adobe-CQ-WEM#IDComment800651505</guid></item><item>
<author>Joshua Ranger</author><title>Joshua Ranger - What does a vendor really mean when they say they cloud? &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2667-What-does-a-vendor-really-mean-when-they-say-they-cloud#IDComment797998913</link><description>In addition to reviewing the vendor&amp;#039;s services and infrastructure, it&amp;#039;s also important to look at what your own purposes and reasoning for using cloud servies are, such as the types and sizes of files, access requirements, and level of operational importance to your organization. We&amp;#039;ve been looking at cloud storage from a preservation point of view, which requires a much higher degree of infrastructure, storage space, and policy development/enforcement than materials that may be used primarily for access only or short term retention. AVPreserve has begun publishing our findings in this area, beginning with our white paper &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.avpreserve.com\/avpsresources\/papers-and-presentations\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Nine Things To Consider When Assessing Cloud Storage&lt;/a&gt;.  Joshua Ranger Senior Consultant AVPreserve </description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:56:40 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2667-What-does-a-vendor-really-mean-when-they-say-they-cloud#IDComment797998913</guid></item><item>
<author>David Diamond</author><title>David Diamond - What does a vendor really mean when they say they cloud? &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2667-What-does-a-vendor-really-mean-when-they-say-they-cloud#IDComment797986580</link><description>To your last point, Apoorv, I would extend this warning to apply to vendors too. At least in the DAM space, I&amp;#039;ve seen a few vendors seem to pop up overnight with &amp;quot;Cloud&amp;quot; versions of their long-time, on-premise software. Yet, in order to manage the software, a Windows Remote Desktop Connection is required, and the software cannot scale on demand. And, as you mentioned, unless the services of a partner are involved, the customer finds it still must running installers and deal with all the updates itself.  In other words, they&amp;#039;re running the same old legacy software on someone else&amp;#039;s virtual machine and calling that a &amp;quot;Cloud solution.&amp;quot; Your #2 point above addresses this. But I would encourage people who are looking for true Cloud solutions to find out a few things:  1. Are you required to ever launch a RDP or VNC client just to access another UI remotely from which you manage *any* aspect of the system? This is primary evidence that it&amp;#039;s not a true Cloud solution, but an on-premise solution that&amp;#039;s running remotely.   2. Does the system scale up and down on demand? This is a primary advantage of true SaaS software but when on-premise software is deployed in a virtual instance, this is typically not an option. Instead, for better performance, the customer has to pay for always-on processing.  3. Does the system require an up-front license purchase? Enterprise Cloud systems usually have some upfront startup costs but there is no license purchase involved. You know you&amp;#039;re buying on-premise software for Cloud deployment when you have that upfront license purchase. And, worse, this is typically the worst of both worlds, cost wise; because you have to pay for that license and you have to pay that ongoing &amp;quot;rent&amp;quot; for the Cloud infrastructure. Then, if you don&amp;#039;t want to be doing all the updates yourself and dealing with maintenance and downtime recoveries, you have to be paying someone for that too. So always do at least a 5-year cost calculation before signing any contracts.  4. What&amp;#039;s the update cycle? SaaS typically has a more frequent update cycle, which means new features (and sometimes bugs) are rolled out faster. On-premise offerings more typically see major updates once a year, or less.   If someone is looking for a Cloud solution, I think they should find one that was born and bred a Cloud solution. Vendors that are throwing their aging on-premise software into virtual instances just to remain relevant are just trying to confuse the market.  David Diamond Director of Global Marketing Picturepark (Disclaimer: SaaS DAM since the year 2000, and now on-prem too) </description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:15:48 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2667-What-does-a-vendor-really-mean-when-they-say-they-cloud#IDComment797986580</guid></item><item>
<author>Boris Kraft</author><title>Boris Kraft - What does a vendor really mean when they say they cloud? &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2667-What-does-a-vendor-really-mean-when-they-say-they-cloud#IDComment797975759</link><description>Maybe follow up with an article about &amp;quot;what does the customer really mean when they talk about cloud&amp;quot; ;-) </description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2667-What-does-a-vendor-really-mean-when-they-say-they-cloud#IDComment797975759</guid></item><item>
<author>Irina Guseva</author><title>Irina Guseva - 2013 Zeitgeist for SaaS CMS and Cloud CMS - Cloud Nein &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2529-2013-Zeitgeist-for-SaaS-CMS-and-Cloud-CMS-Cloud-Nein#IDComment794811984</link><description>Hi Daniel,  Overall, SaaS CMS has been a somewhat volatile segment of the market. Without knowing much about your micro enterprise, I would still say be cautious in general, regardless of the number of employees.  Best, Irina </description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:21:38 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2529-2013-Zeitgeist-for-SaaS-CMS-and-Cloud-CMS-Cloud-Nein#IDComment794811984</guid></item><item>
<author>Daniel</author><title>Daniel - 2013 Zeitgeist for SaaS CMS and Cloud CMS - Cloud Nein &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2529-2013-Zeitgeist-for-SaaS-CMS-and-Cloud-CMS-Cloud-Nein#IDComment794768200</link><description>Hi Irina,   how do you see the potential for a SaaS CMS for micro enterprizes, like the 5 employee cafe next door?  cheers,  Daniel </description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:08:09 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2529-2013-Zeitgeist-for-SaaS-CMS-and-Cloud-CMS-Cloud-Nein#IDComment794768200</guid></item><item>
<author>@eaton</author><title>@eaton - When open source CMS vendors try to re-invent application development communism &lt; Real Story Group B</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2658-When-open-source-CMS-vendors-try-to-re-invent-application-development-communism#IDComment790208735</link><description>I was one of the vocal proponents of this approach in the Drupal community years back (we called it Smallcore). While I think it was a net win for our codebase, it wasn&amp;#039;t the beginning of a cross-community renaissance. As @MKSECom says, once you get beyond basic stuff like authentication and templating, most CMS features are deeply rooted in the philosophical assumptions the product makes about content, organization, and so on.  Drupal 8 is taking a slightly different approach: instead of trying to popularize small chunks of Drupal&amp;#039;s codebase as general purpose libraries, it&amp;#039;s refactoring its own internals to leverage existing third-party frameworks like Symfony. That approach HAS led to more productive collaboration with other development communities, and reduced the amount of home-grown code that&amp;#039;s exclusive to the Drupal development pool. </description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:08:01 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2658-When-open-source-CMS-vendors-try-to-re-invent-application-development-communism#IDComment790208735</guid></item><item>
<author>@MKSECom</author><title>@MKSECom - When open source CMS vendors try to re-invent application development communism &lt; Real Story Group B</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2658-When-open-source-CMS-vendors-try-to-re-invent-application-development-communism#IDComment790200912</link><description>Well, Content Management Interoperability Services didn&amp;#039;t really turn out a success, right? So why should Joomla even try on their own? Three years later as well, must be even harder. And this kind of CMS-feature code must be easier to rewrite than to rewrite twice and adopt to any central frameworks standards. </description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2658-When-open-source-CMS-vendors-try-to-re-invent-application-development-communism#IDComment790200912</guid></item><item>
<author>StuckWithCQ</author><title>StuckWithCQ - The Case Against Adobe CQ - WEM &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2563-The-Case-Against-Adobe-CQ-WEM#IDComment789668491</link><description>If you only spent 1 million, you got off easy! </description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:44:29 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2563-The-Case-Against-Adobe-CQ-WEM#IDComment789668491</guid></item><item>
<author>Matt Wilkinson</author><title>Matt Wilkinson - Newsgator Social Sites Internal Communications Solution - A Quick Take &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2570-Newsgator-Social-Sites-Internal-Communications-Solution-A-Quick-Take#IDComment788709999</link><description>Bart - how can tiles be configured so that users cannot remove them??  interesting write up Kashyap </description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:51:21 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2570-Newsgator-Social-Sites-Internal-Communications-Solution-A-Quick-Take#IDComment788709999</guid></item><item>
<author>john coaxum</author><title>john coaxum - Metadata management in DAMs still inadequate &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2652-Metadata-management-in-DAMs-still-inadequate#IDComment788441020</link><description>would it not be easier to converge all this on one platform as an enterprise?  </description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:10:52 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2652-Metadata-management-in-DAMs-still-inadequate#IDComment788441020</guid></item><item>
<author>Alexander Kogan</author><title>Alexander Kogan - The Difference between SharePoint and Lotus Notes &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1752-The-Difference-between-SharePoint-and-Lotus-Notes#IDComment785147066</link><description>You forgot to mention that Lotus/Domino comes with a powerfull C-API functions. By that you can write many Server-Tasks that runs under Domino server for allmost any need in your company. Sure, you may need some C skills but it is well dicumented with a lot of samples.  Lotus provieds a powerfull COM Objects as well that can be used by any Microsoft Office program for reporting and printing perposes.  As a software develeper with about 27 years of experience I can recomend Lotus Notes as a rapid development environment to solve business workflows  and quickly sharing data across the globe.  A.Kogan </description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:12:07 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1752-The-Difference-between-SharePoint-and-Lotus-Notes#IDComment785147066</guid></item><item>
<author>lucasneetham</author><title>lucasneetham - Apache Cordova supports Ubuntu Touch -- How long before IBM, Oracle, and others follow? &lt; Real Story</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2646-Apache-Cordova-supports-Ubuntu-Touch-How-long-before-IBM-Oracle-and-others-follow#IDComment782163684</link><description>nice post </description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 06:59:48 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2646-Apache-Cordova-supports-Ubuntu-Touch-How-long-before-IBM-Oracle-and-others-follow#IDComment782163684</guid></item><item>
<author>Ian McNemar</author><title>Ian McNemar - Adobe To Acquire Day - Second Take - DAM Perspective &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/1961-Adobe-To-Acquire-Day-Second-Take-DAM-Perspective#IDComment770664105</link><description>3 years after purchasing Adobe CQ, I still believe this all to be true. It&amp;#039;s a weak offering that doesn&amp;#039;t hold up to the more tried-and-true DAMs on the market. </description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:24:26 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/1961-Adobe-To-Acquire-Day-Second-Take-DAM-Perspective#IDComment770664105</guid></item><item>
<author>Theresa Regli</author><title>Theresa Regli - Update to our Digital Marketing and Digital Workplace vendor map &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2636-Update-to-our-Digital-Marketing-and-Digital-Workplace-vendor-map#IDComment767230037</link><description>Hi Albert, We renamed it because Content Technology is a very broad term and our analysis is particularly focused on digital marketing and the digital workplace / intranets. We don&amp;#039;t evaluate ERP systems for example, but some may put that in the category of content technology. We wanted to be more specific with our terminology.  Hope that makes it clear why we changed the name. Thanks for your comment! </description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:23:07 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2636-Update-to-our-Digital-Marketing-and-Digital-Workplace-vendor-map#IDComment767230037</guid></item><item>
<author>rahulkuma007</author><title>rahulkuma007 - Mobile App Development is about much more than UI creation &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title><link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2623-Mobile-App-Development-is-about-much-more-than-UI-creation#IDComment763636220</link><description> Hi, It is nice blog , i am steven lyone from usa ........ there is an another company (A1Brandz) in USA which provides &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.a1brandz.com/web-portal- development.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Web portal development &lt;/a&gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.a1brandz.com/web- ortal-development.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Customized Portal Developer NY&lt;/a&gt; and many more services.  </description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Dec 2013 13:30:38 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2623-Mobile-App-Development-is-about-much-more-than-UI-creation#IDComment763636220</guid></item>	</channel></rss>