<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>All Blog Comments</title>		<language>en-us</language>		<link>http://blog.chungyc.org</link>		<description>All comments from Stochastic Scribbles</description><item>
<author>HanaPipers</author><title>HanaPipers - Angered by conservatives, blame liberals</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/07/angered-by-conservatives-blame-liberals/#IDComment286819884</link><description>:) </description><pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 06:22:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/07/angered-by-conservatives-blame-liberals/#IDComment286819884</guid></item><item>
<author>ensrjb</author><title>ensrjb - Two ovens to go</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/two-ovens-to-go/#IDComment234604293</link><description>4AM2NB  &lt;a href=&quot;http://jjursbxdpchh.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jjursbxdpchh&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:47:50 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/two-ovens-to-go/#IDComment234604293</guid></item><item>
<author>nbahxasvm</author><title>nbahxasvm - Two ovens to go</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/two-ovens-to-go/#IDComment233535046</link><description>FmKXx4  &lt;a href=&quot;http://sgimkcpgzodq.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sgimkcpgzodq&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:27:29 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/two-ovens-to-go/#IDComment233535046</guid></item><item>
<author>information</author><title>information - Sound in space</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/sound-in-space/#IDComment233225217</link><description>Great weblog here! Also your web site lots up fast! What host are you the use of? Can I get your affiliate hyperlink on your host? I want my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol</description><pubDate>Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:43:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/sound-in-space/#IDComment233225217</guid></item><item>
<author>salve</author><title>salve - Have you seen a UFO?</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/01/have-you-seen-a-ufo/#IDComment191002924</link><description>hej jeg kommer fra danmark </description><pubDate>Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:16:13 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/01/have-you-seen-a-ufo/#IDComment191002924</guid></item><item>
<author>salve</author><title>salve - Have you seen a UFO?</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/01/have-you-seen-a-ufo/#IDComment191001428</link><description>tis</description><pubDate>Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:09:59 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/01/have-you-seen-a-ufo/#IDComment191001428</guid></item><item>
<author>Gokhan</author><title>Gokhan - The probability of a probability</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/11/probability-of-probability/#IDComment137210309</link><description>This question is totally stupid. There are problems with probability of a probability which makes sense but this problem makes no sense. Let me explain. You have a distribution with two discrete values; one is r and the other is 1-r. These values refer to an event which can be described by a random variable X. This whole together describes a random process if you have some samples to evaluate. Lets have x_i a sample of X and this sample is known. Does it give any idea about the distribution of an event? definitely it does not.  x_i might even be coming from a Gaussian distribution. You need to ask it to the god )) </description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:09:18 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/11/probability-of-probability/#IDComment137210309</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - 137</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/137/#IDComment105554111</link><description>For those who are interested in hydrogen spectral lines, I created the images here through an applet available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://astro.u-strasbg.fr/~koppen/discharge/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://astro.u-strasbg.fr/~koppen/discharge/&lt;/a&gt; </description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:02:30 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/10/137/#IDComment105554111</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Spirit no longer roving</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2010/01/spirit-no-longer-roving/#IDComment54003880</link><description>That&amp;#039;s too bad. :-( </description><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:10:56 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2010/01/spirit-no-longer-roving/#IDComment54003880</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Guns versus bombs</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2010/01/guns-versus-bombs/#IDComment53488608</link><description>I couldn&amp;#039;t agree more ... </description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:50:55 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2010/01/guns-versus-bombs/#IDComment53488608</guid></item><item>
<author>Pliny-the-in-Between</author><title>Pliny-the-in-Between - Guns versus bombs</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2010/01/guns-versus-bombs/#IDComment53170543</link><description>Yes, Narcissistic murdering of innocents is narcissistic murder no matter what the method. I&amp;#039;ve always wished that those who choose murder /suicide would simply reverse the order. </description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:21:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2010/01/guns-versus-bombs/#IDComment53170543</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Massive ordnance penetrator</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/11/massive-ordnance-penetrator/#IDComment50726324</link><description>Crud, you&amp;#039;re absolutely right.  Converting it to &amp;quot;kilo-pounds&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;kilo-kilograms&amp;quot;, I somehow only perceived the &amp;quot;kilo-&amp;quot; part and totally forgot that &amp;quot;kilogram&amp;quot; is not &amp;quot;ton&amp;quot;.  Mea culpa.  (Tries to find a hole to hide in for a while.) </description><pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:37:10 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/11/massive-ordnance-penetrator/#IDComment50726324</guid></item><item>
<author>thatguy</author><title>thatguy - Massive ordnance penetrator</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/11/massive-ordnance-penetrator/#IDComment50675688</link><description>Sorry, I think you&amp;#039;re mistaken about the yield of the MOP.  The bomb itself weighs about 14 metric tons, NOT kilotons, since 1 kiloton = 1000 tons. Also, the warhead itself is apparently only 2.4 metric tons.  </description><pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:01:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/11/massive-ordnance-penetrator/#IDComment50675688</guid></item><item>
<author>ajanta</author><title>ajanta - Confirmation of water on the Moon</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/09/confirmation-of-water-on-the-moon/#IDComment50061925</link><description>existence of water on the moon maybe a future possibility. </description><pubDate>Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:32:43 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/09/confirmation-of-water-on-the-moon/#IDComment50061925</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Global map of Mercury</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/12/global-map-of-mercury/#IDComment47719987</link><description>Can you please tell me what it is?  Pretty please? ;)  (Asking around on &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/2009\/12\/15\/messenger-team-releases-first-global-map-of-mercury\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Universe Today&lt;/a&gt;, it turns out to be a lighting artifact.  I&amp;#039;m surprised that there were uniformly no bright images to fill in the dark areas.) </description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:30:50 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/12/global-map-of-mercury/#IDComment47719987</guid></item><item>
<author>bigjohn756</author><title>bigjohn756 - Global map of Mercury</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/12/global-map-of-mercury/#IDComment47444107</link><description>I know what the dark band is, but, I'm not going to tell. </description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:57:57 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/12/global-map-of-mercury/#IDComment47444107</guid></item><item>
<author>bigjohn756</author><title>bigjohn756 - The 11/3 Project</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/11/the-113-project/#IDComment42229066</link><description>That was, indeed, an excellent job of imitating Beck. Stewart has him nailed. I wonder if those who couldn&amp;#039;t watch Beck yesterday would have gotten a satisfactory fix from Stewart&amp;#039;s rendition.  </description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/11/the-113-project/#IDComment42229066</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Can't have everything</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/10/cant-have-everything/#IDComment41064569</link><description>Well, there is another saying: Hope springs eternal. ;) </description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:35:53 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/10/cant-have-everything/#IDComment41064569</guid></item><item>
<author>Pliny-the-in-Between</author><title>Pliny-the-in-Between - Can't have everything</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/10/cant-have-everything/#IDComment40987826</link><description>There you go again, expecting this to be a logical argument ;) </description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:07:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/10/cant-have-everything/#IDComment40987826</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Can't have everything</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/10/cant-have-everything/#IDComment40900632</link><description>Glad you liked it. :) </description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:52:57 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/10/cant-have-everything/#IDComment40900632</guid></item>	</channel></rss>
