<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>All Blog Comments</title>		<language>en-us</language>		<link>http://blog.chungyc.org</link>		<description>All comments from Stochastic Scribbles</description><item>
<author>Pliny-the-in-Between</author><title>Pliny-the-in-Between - A new baryon: &amp;Omega;&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/omega-sub-b/#IDComment25987114</link><description>That would throw a pretty big monkey wrench into the standard model if it never showed itself, I understand. </description><pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:33:44 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/omega-sub-b/#IDComment25987114</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - A new baryon: &amp;Omega;&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/omega-sub-b/#IDComment25979389</link><description>No news for the Higgs boson so far.  It will probably be a while, with the LHC having to start up again and then taking a few years to go up to full power.  Fermilab could end up lucky and discover it in the meantime, though.  On the other hand, it would also be &lt;em&gt;huge&lt;/em&gt; news if the LHC never observes the Higgs after years of operating at full power. </description><pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:57:30 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/omega-sub-b/#IDComment25979389</guid></item><item>
<author>Pliny-the-in-Between</author><title>Pliny-the-in-Between - A new baryon: &amp;Omega;&lt;sub&gt;b&lt;/sub&gt;</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/omega-sub-b/#IDComment25963462</link><description>Any new updates on the search for the Higgs?  </description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:43:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/omega-sub-b/#IDComment25963462</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Kaguya to the Moon</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/kaguya-to-the-moon/#IDComment23714692</link><description>Neat! :-)  </description><pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:46:40 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/kaguya-to-the-moon/#IDComment23714692</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Supporting science speech</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/supporting-science-speech/#IDComment23448214</link><description>I feel so lucky that we don&amp;#039;t have to deal with any type of pseudoscience in Florida.  &amp;lt;/sarcasm&amp;gt; I wonder if anything would have happened to that teacher if he had said ... &amp;quot;Palm reading is fantasy&amp;quot;? </description><pubDate>Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:21:29 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/supporting-science-speech/#IDComment23448214</guid></item><item>
<author>Pliny-the-in-Between</author><title>Pliny-the-in-Between - Supporting science speech</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/supporting-science-speech/#IDComment23372237</link><description>Closer to home is the recent ruling that a science teacher&amp;#039;s admittedly less than tactful remarks about creationism landed him in hot water for allegedly violating the establishment clause of First Amendment (Farnan vs Corbett).  Since the federal courts have essentially labeled creationism religious pseudoscience, should the truth ever be in violation of the First Amendment? </description><pubDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:36:12 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/supporting-science-speech/#IDComment23372237</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Religious schools and abortions</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/religious-schools-and-abortions/#IDComment23269653</link><description>Sounds like burning down the house to put out a match.  At least I &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; the sort of parents who send their children to religious schools would be likely to have more severe opinions about abortion than about sex.  It&amp;#039;s ironic how anti-sex and anti-abortion views are responsible for more abortions ... </description><pubDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:13:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/religious-schools-and-abortions/#IDComment23269653</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Religious schools and abortions</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/religious-schools-and-abortions/#IDComment23191730</link><description>It&amp;#039;s because they are scared of getting in trouble w/ mommy and daddy. Sex is taboo- she shouldn&amp;#039;t have been engaging in that activity in the first place. </description><pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:10:03 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/06/religious-schools-and-abortions/#IDComment23191730</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Curiosity</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/curiosity/#IDComment22509844</link><description>Well, it&amp;#039;s what &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; say ... ;)  (It&amp;#039;s my own punnish way of hoping that we hear from the rover after it lands. :) </description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:16:35 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/curiosity/#IDComment22509844</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Curiosity</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/curiosity/#IDComment22476197</link><description>We don&amp;#039;t talk about killing kittehs!! </description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 02:41:06 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/curiosity/#IDComment22476197</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - No terrorists for US prisons</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/no-terrorists-for-us-prisons/#IDComment21905639</link><description>Space colonies - yea, that&amp;#039;s the ticket! </description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/no-terrorists-for-us-prisons/#IDComment21905639</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - A surgeon recused</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/a-surgeon-recused/#IDComment21493197</link><description>:-) </description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:58:22 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/a-surgeon-recused/#IDComment21493197</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - A surgeon recused</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/a-surgeon-recused/#IDComment21434193</link><description>A father and son caught a fish together: I just had to think of another solution rather than the standard one. :)  (OK, it might be a stretch ...)  (The grandfather solution was easy enough to think of: something similar was mentioned in the comments at Richard Wiseman&amp;#039;s blog. :) </description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:24:42 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/a-surgeon-recused/#IDComment21434193</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - A surgeon recused</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/a-surgeon-recused/#IDComment21235180</link><description>Here&amp;#039;s one ... 2 fathers and 2 sons go fishing They each catch a fish Total number of fish caught = 3 (please explain) </description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/a-surgeon-recused/#IDComment21235180</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Killing the firstborn</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/killing-the-firstborn/#IDComment21183116</link><description>Ummm ... I wouldn&amp;#039;t want to kill anyone but if I were going to, I guess it would be the fewest amount possible while still keeping my promise. (use those loopholes, baby) </description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 14:05:48 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/killing-the-firstborn/#IDComment21183116</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Killing the firstborn</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/killing-the-firstborn/#IDComment21168351</link><description>&amp;quot;You&amp;quot; are supposed to be the one doing the killing, why should &amp;quot;you&amp;quot; run away? </description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 03:10:21 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/killing-the-firstborn/#IDComment21168351</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Killing the firstborn</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/killing-the-firstborn/#IDComment21142073</link><description>Run away??  </description><pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2009 16:34:26 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/killing-the-firstborn/#IDComment21142073</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Science Gossip</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/science-gossip/#IDComment20557810</link><description>Thanks!  Most of the work right now is just getting enough content so that there&amp;#039;s at least some regular updates, although the amount of work will increase drastically if people start submitting lots of blog articles to include. </description><pubDate>Mon, 4 May 2009 00:56:15 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/science-gossip/#IDComment20557810</guid></item><item>
<author>Stacy</author><title>Stacy - Science Gossip</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/science-gossip/#IDComment20477703</link><description>Good luck. It sounds like a HUGE project! </description><pubDate>Sun, 3 May 2009 12:08:54 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/science-gossip/#IDComment20477703</guid></item><item>
<author>Yoo</author><title>Yoo - Science Gossip</title><link>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/science-gossip/#IDComment20377090</link><description>Thanks, I&amp;#039;ll need the luck. :) </description><pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2009 18:46:25 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.chungyc.org/2009/05/science-gossip/#IDComment20377090</guid></item>	</channel></rss>